Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safdar Zaidi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  20:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Safdar Zaidi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources per WP:RS. No real world notability as search produces nothing. Writing single novel and translating to Dutch language won't make someone notable. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:ANYBIO. No notable awards or done something special. Fails WP:GNG

Source 1: Daily Dharti, not notable as it is a local online website. Its posts are related to the problems faced by Pakistani diaspora and can't be trusted. Source 3,5,8 are related to the same website which is a local unreliable source. Source 4 discuss him but that single source doesn't show he has done something special.

Adding to that I searched local Urdu newspapers and can't find anything. He doesn't have an article on Dutch or Urdu Wikipedia. If anyone has any reliable sources please post and I will have no objection.  Greenbörg  (talk)  11:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete author of non-notable novel/books therefore fails WP:AUTHOR. cited sources are not reliable except one noted above but as said it doesn't discuss the subject in detail. --Saqib (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * delete' Moona Sehgal (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  09:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * delete fails as author notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.68.48.166 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Fails GNG, unconvincing sourcing in article. Previous !vote was not properly formatted. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  19:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.