Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafeAmerica Credit Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete, and research supports the view that there are few independent sources which are primarily promotional and/or press releases. SilkTork (talk) 00:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

SafeAmerica Credit Union
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Credit Union Stats )

SafeAmerica Credit Union does not meet Wikipedia's GNG. They are a small credit union with 4 branches and 63 full time employees. They have no press coverage from reliable third party sources. Their Wikipedia entry relies heavily on primary sources and reads like an advertisement. Sonstephen0 (talk) 20:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent source. —  Mathieudu68  talk 21:16, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, this falls below our radar. bd2412  T 12:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete sadly, per and nom, whose word I'll take for it. Most credit unions, Canada and the U.S., fail WP:GNG and certainly WP:CORPDEPTH. --Doug Mehus (talk) 23:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.