Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saga of Souls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. Punkmorten 20:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Saga of Souls
Please note: I am putting this in today's AfD log (September 11, 2006) because I failed to do so on the day that I nominated it (August 31, 2006). Thank you to Wmahan for bringing this to my attention. ... disco spinster   talk  15:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Unpublished book by non-notable author; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Prod tag removed. Good luck to the aspiring writer, but it's not yet at the level of a Wikipedia article.

I am also nominating the article about the book's author: ZB Fischer. ... disco spinster   talk  20:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related articles for the same reasons, per Elmer Clark's suggestion:
 * ZB Fischer
 * The Possession Trilogy
 * The Morbid Angel
 * The Deceptive Demon
 * Valiant Soul
 * Experiment 18L

... disco spinster   talk  14:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable author not published by any traditional publishers. I also suggest you add The Possession Trilogy, The Morbid Angel, The Deceptive Demon, Valiant Soul, and Experiment 18L to the nomination. -Elmer Clark 02:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per noms. -IceCreamAntisocial 07:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all. No doubt it's impressive to have written a book at age 14. But in general I think self-published books and their authors shouldn't have articles unless there is verifiable evidence of notability, regardless of the author's age. Wmahan. 22:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per noms. Hope to see these articles again in ~5 years. My Alt Account 15:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all Lincolnite 16:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Danny Lilithborne 18:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Anger22 22:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all Well developed and written, author is notable, has website and large fanbase. 209.192.78.149 22:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * you people who say this should be deleted should be ashamed of yourselves. You should at least read the story instead of jumping to conclusions. I myself have read it and enjoyed it very much. I'm sure you will too if you just read it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.133.3.72 (talk • contribs).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.