Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saga of shimizu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 01:22, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Saga of shimizu
Vanity article, only 100 readers. — ceejayoz talk  23:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If 110 is too few, then oh well. I thought it was a significant number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.121.149.117 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 23 October 2005
 * Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz talk [[Image:Flag_of_Australia.svg|24px]] 23:31, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ceejayoz, the thing is that if we leave the page UP, we can get publicity for the saga, and thus have more readers. Catch 22 sort of thing.  What's wrong with leaving it up, anyways? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.168.1.101 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 23 October 2005
 * Wikipedia is not a promotional venue. — ceejayoz talk [[Image:Flag_of_Australia.svg|24px]] 23:58, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment. Saga of Shimizu is also up for deletion, the only difference between the two articles being the second capital 'S' in the title. Saberwyn 04:38, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TheMadBaron 07:41, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity --Rogerd 04:13, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.