Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Brahmbhatt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Sagar Brahmbhatt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence for notability: was an unsuccessful election candidate in 2017. Article includes a lot of irrelevance about his father, but no assertion of notability for the subject. Was nominated for CSD A7 on basis of having no credible assertion of importance or significance, but rejected on basis of "Fails WP:NPOL courtesy coming 2nd in the 2017 Gujarat Assembly elections but not A7able stuff. Approach AFD." Pam D  17:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 04:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 04:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 04:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 04:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they didn't win — if he does not already have a preexisting notability claim that would already have gotten him into Wikipedia regardless of his candidacy, then he has to win the election and thereby hold the office, not just run and lose, to get a Wikipedia article because election. Bearcat (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete An unelected candidate generally fails WP:NPOL so would have to meet GNG, which this individual does not. Chetsford (talk) 07:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.