Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar International School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Sagar International School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication of Notability. The sources are either to school directories, primary sources (school's website) or trivial mentions in local media. WP:PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 02:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. It looks like an notable article. In google trends and facebook, this institute has considerable notability. There are so many schools of similar repute in wikipidia. Even the creator of this article is not interested to reply, so I can't trace it out more about this or expand or find sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ugvugvgu (talk • contribs) 12:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 02:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator as this is referenced to a bunch of ridiculously trivial sources that are either primary or otherwise not usable for notability. The fact that it is massively ref bombed doesn't bode well for notability either. Instead it just comes like an attempt to fake things. Nor does Facebook or Google Trends' opinions of what is notable matter here. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per the nomination.-- SM7 --talk-- 19:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep If this article has no notability, almost all articles of the category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Schools_in_Erode_district has no notability. I feel this page has some good scope of expansion. It can be made stub rather to delete. Malay231 (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete A case of WP:REFBOMB that uses mostly primary sources and directories to make the subject seem important. Secondary schools don't have assumed notability, and there doesn't appear to be secondary sources to meet other notability guidelines. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES suggests merging with the school district, but merging with Erode District seems like WP:UNDUE. The keep arguments above are based solely on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.