Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Kulkarni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Sagar Kulkarni

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I suspect this fails WP:GNG. The article fails WP:CRIN as he hasn't played first-class/List A/Twenty20, or appeared in the World Cricket League to Division 5 or above. He is noted as being the first player to hit a double century in Twenty20 club cricket, although this was made in a club game in Singapore, which WP:CRIN deems non-notable. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete for me, a definite delete: a Google search brings up very little, and simply being the first player to score a double century in twenty over cricket doesn't make him notable in my opinion. We know nothing about the opposing batting attack, and it wouldn't surprise me if someone else has managed it at some point without any notable coverage.  Harrias  talk 19:23, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:CRIN and only significant coverage is a result of the one innings – feels like a WP:BLP1E issue to me. Jenks24 (talk) 01:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.