Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Savaliya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Sagar Savaliya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I read thru all the provided links. Every single one refers to a single story/incident from 2017 where he started a briefly trending political hashtag. Unless it's in sources I'm missing because they're not English & not showing in Search he has done nothing else notable. A mention of his name in articles about the campaign makes more sense than a page since he doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 (talk) 09:11, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG. Even the campaign fails WP:GNG, at best it can have a mention in 2017 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election page. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Looked through the sources that are not in English and this is clear WP:1E case. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I have done significant improvement in this page. He has received significant coverage in reliable and independent sources therefore it follows WP:GNG. He has played significant role in Patidar reservation agitation & Vikas gando thayo chhe (Development has gone crazy) was his brainchild. There are huge coverage about him like his education, career in reliable and independent sources. He is also founder of popular Gujarati news website Gujarat Khabar. Therefore it also follows WP:1E.So I would request you guys to review your decision of deletion of this page. It follows every policy and guidelines of Wikipedia. This page should remain on Wikipedia.(Ys91620 (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC))
 * Delete for self-evident reasons. Dorama285 17:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.