Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SageTea Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

SageTea Software

 * – ( View AfD View log )

G11 borderline eligible article for a non notable organization that fails to satisfy WP:ORGCRIT as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search shows hits in primary sources and other unreliable sources such as crunchbase. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete – coverage is not significant enough. One interview in a local paper – Thjarkur (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete My google search did not find anything to meet WP:ORGCRIT, the only refence in article to something other then the government of the company is about a legal action. Jeepday (talk) 17:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to pass either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.