Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sage Hill, Calgary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep in one form or another. Same as with Articles for deletion/Nolan Hill.  So Why  07:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Sage Hill, Calgary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a city neighborhood, which is not a well-established community with a properly sourced or notable history. Per GEOLAND, neighborhoods must meet GNG for a separate article. Article has five sources, all of which are primary (City of Calgary). Searching primarily turns up routine real-estate listings. Insufficient coverage in independent RS. MB 02:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge to List of neighbourhoods in Calgary, as per WP:ATD-M. North America1000 02:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep based on longstanding consensus that all residential neighbourhoods in Calgary and Edmonton are notable enough for articles. This article was created in good faith based on the precedent that all others had articles. Although a newer neighbourhood, it is no less important than an older established neighbourhood that only has the benefit of more time passed to accrue a more fulsome history. It will accumulate its history over time. Surely some non-City of Calgary sources can be found. If this is deleted on these grounds, surely dozens and dozens of Calgary's other ~200 residential neighbourhoods are eligible to suffer the same fate as well. I'd much rather see a single deletion discussion of a large volume of these similar articles rather than picking them off one-by-one, such as is currently and suddenly the case with this, Legacy, Calgary and Nolan Hill despite years of Calgary residential neighbourhood article stability. Hwy43 (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per longstanding consensus that neighborhoods of Calgary are individually notable. If people disagree with that consensus, picking them off one by one is not the solution. Smartyllama (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, picking off non-notable articles one-by-one is standard practice in pruning "nests". --Bejnar (talk) 05:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment The consensus is documented in WP:GEOLAND and it does not contain any special exemption for Calgary neighborhoods making them de facto notable.MB 15:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of neighbourhoods in Calgary, there are no independent sources, and the content is not of the sort requiring an article. It may be possible that List of neighbourhoods in Calgary could be developed into an article by consolidating these split-off (content-fork, if you will) articles, and thus improve the encyclopedic nature of the Wikipedia. It does indeed seem to fail GEOLAND. --Bejnar (talk) 05:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.