Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagent Pharmaceuticals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 20:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Sagent Pharmaceuticals

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested PROD, so this is the next step. Another editor commented on the taIk page that they don't see how this passes WP:NCORP. I don't see enough independent RS in the article as this time.

Of the Google search, I see a lot of non-independent sources, as well as recruitment sites. I admittedly don't know anything about the other sources that come up.  ArcAngel    (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.    ArcAngel    (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Illinois.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Sagent Pharmaceuticals is a company in Schaumburg IL. The citations and page are all valid and speaks to what the company does. Why would you delete the page? 4.14.10.194 (talk) 17:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 3 of the references in the article, while they may be valid, are not independent of the subject. The goal here is for the article to gain enough reliable sources to pass WP:NCORP.     ArcAngel    (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Because we are no longer a publicly traded company, there are often not enough articles written about us to have outside sources. We do not do prese releases and articles are generally not written about us. 4.14.10.194 (talk) 17:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment there may also be WP:COI issues. JMWt (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I am the head of Marketing. We are not publishing anything that isn't non factual. No opinions. Just general information about the company. 4.14.10.194 (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, that's a potential issue. It is probably worth you looking at WP:COIEDIT. JMWt (talk) 19:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not appear to pass WP:NCORP. Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 20:45, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. As I said elsewhere, it seems WP:NCORP is not met. I have looked rather extensively, and while I have found this article, "Down But Not Out: Nichi-Iko Hives Off Sagent, Exits North America" (which is more about Nichi-Iko), on the Pharma Intelligence website, most of the other online mentions are either (1) press releases from the company (mostly about company acquisitions), (2) clear repetitions of company press release, (3) mentions of voluntary recalls, or (4) glancing mentions of Sagent in articles about something else. I find a lack of significant, independent coverage from secondary sources. (Not relevant to the question of notability, but glaringly annoying: the misapprehension by what appears to be multiple Sagent employees that it is page and needs to have the "right" information about "our company".) &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 12:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam and a notable corporation. Look, in 2023, everyone knows we are not a free web host for a business. To argue that there's nothing wrong, when even ordinary readers know otherwise, is untenable. Bearian (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.