Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sago Sago


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

There is no policy-based argument on why this article should be Kept and no strong support for a Merger. If editors want to work on an article in Draft space and submit it to WP:AFC for review, contact me or WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Sago Sago

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unfortunately the article currently falls well short of WP:GNG and WP:CORP. The article's three cited sources are either bulletin-style without commentary or trivial; regardless generally not WP:SIGCOV about the background of the company. A WP:BEFORE finds a lot of Sago products online but only a Verge product review and a staff interview from Kidscreen (?) seem to enter the standard of coverage needed. I imagine there may be more out there though. There's also a naming issue: if Sago Mini is the current name of the company, the article should not be called Sago Sago unless there is enormous coverage on the former state which is not the case. An obvious WP:ATD is to WP:MERGE what little there is to Toca Boca or Spin Master. Welcome any thoughts, particularly from users that are more experienced with notability pertaining to companies in this sector. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Business,  and Internet. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * We need to keep it forever by expanding it Tomasz22334 (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * And the references too Tomasz22334 (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * And even renaming it to Sago Mini Tomasz22334 (talk) 23:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand it can be a bit disappointing if there is consensus that the article is not notable. WP:GNG is generally a threshold for determining what articles should be included on Wikipedia because there is sufficient coverage to show that the subject merits an article. On keeping an article that doesn't quite meet that standard but could in the future, there's always the ability to develop an article in WP:DRAFT and we can definitely WP:DRAFTIFY the article as an option that doesn't involve deleting anything you've done. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please expand it, add more references and rename and move it to Sago Mini to keep it forever as a result. Tomasz22334 (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That's something that's up to you or an interested editor to do. The AFD discussion here is about whether the subject itself has enough coverage to merit an article in the first place. Although hopefully this discussion can settle whether there's reliable coverage out there. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. As far as I can tell, most of the information on it comes from either sellers of its products, or distributers of the TV show "Sago Mini Friends". Although it is a Spin Master brand, I don't know if there's enough verifiable information on it to justify a merge (especially since the Spin Master page already has most of the information that I could find). Ships  &amp;  Space (Edits) 00:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Undo delete Tomasz22334 (talk) 02:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please provide WP:THREE sources that talk about Sago Sago in detail. Proving notability is the only way you can help this article stay. Merko (talk) 19:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Abandon this discussion Tomasz22334 (talk) 23:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.