Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagovindars boning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Otyg. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  02:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Sagovindars boning

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable recording Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the band Otyg, merging such content as is appropriate (ATD, PRESERVE, R). James500 (talk) 17:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It was a redirect and you removed it. You don't get to play this both ways. Could we please have statistics showing how many searches for this article have been done over the past year to determine if it is a valid search term? Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  21:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep. I believe the article covers notable and noteworthy subject matter. The album was made by Otyg, a band with associations to such musical projects as Vintersorg. Also, the album was released on Napalm Records, a highly noteworthy record label of underground metal music. While the sourcing could be improved and the article could contain more information, I think it is absolutely notable and worth keeping the article for. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 07:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I agree with the above comments and think the album passes WP:GNG, found some reviews here, ,and   Atlantic306 (talk) 02:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 02:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, metal-archives.com is confirmed as a sourced that fails to meet WP:RS. From the looks of it, the other two do as well. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * You're correct, metal archives is on the avoid list, but the other two are not on the list. Arcticmetal.no seems ok, its been going since 1999 and has a dedicated staff, while metal.de seems well established. The list of music RS has very few non-english sources which makes things difficult.Atlantic306 (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't say they were on the not-reliable list, I just said that they don't appear to be reliable. You're free to take them to WP:RSN to confirm. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Otyg. No reliable source coverage found, but as one of only two albums by the band it's worth a redirect. --Michig (talk) 07:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.