Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahaba's ancestors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete; merging and deleting is a pain in the ass (at best), since the GFDL requires the preservation of the content's history. Johnleemk | Talk 14:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Sahaba's ancestors

 * Delete per WP:NOT, in particular number 6 on genealogical entries. Jersey Devil 12:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yes per nominator.--MONGO 13:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * keep per Articles for deletion/Family tree of Uthman ibn Affan and Category:Muslim family trees. --Striver 14:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge to Sahaba. Joelito 15:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Sahaba article would be dominated by this list. --Striver 16:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, JerseyDevil, but this is a useful referent to a large set of Muslim pages. Therefore, it is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I'm going to have to go with rename, keep and cleanup on this one. Alba 23:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep it seems to be usefull for readers. But current design is not easy to understand --Ugur Basak 01:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge to Sahaba - No consensus in AfD doesn't set precedents and neither does a category created within 10 minutes of nomination of this article. The Sahaba  are notable for their association with the Prophet Muhammad  but that doesn't mean their ancestry also becomes notable. It would be better for Striver to focus his attentions away from creating single-person family trees and move towards creating a dynastic family tree centred on the first five leaders of the Muslim community - the Prophet Muhammad and the four Rightly Guided Caliphs. I suggest the Family tree of the Eighteenth dynasty of Egypt as a guide to how such a family tree should be portrayed. Focus Striver, focus! Green Giant 01:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, their ancestry is also notable, you can often find the patronymics for up to 5-6 generations going back. --Striver 19:03, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge to Sahaba as above. Separate family tree nodes for each person are hard to read, better in their proper context, i.e. the person's entry. Maybe separate family tree for very notable families (families, NOT people, and very notable.) Weregerbil 12:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge to Sahaba as above. MaNeMeBasat 07:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep because it's too large for the Sahaba article. -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 20:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT keeps slipping into WP:Didn't used to be. — Mar. 29, '06 [06:52] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.