Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahagin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cabayi (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Sahagin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

De-PRODed in 2009. Article about a supposed mythological creature in eastern European legend. The only references to it that I can find are from Dungeons & Dragons and Final Fantasy fan sites, and one mention in an adaptation of Beowulf. I would love to find a source about the original folklore, but I see nothing. As it stands, this does not pass WP:GNG. Mbdfar (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - lack of coverage in reliable sources Spiderone  20:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - If someone wanted to create a Redirect to an appropriate D&D or FF related article after deletion, that would probably be fine. But as it stands, this article is complete WP:OR, and should absolutely not be retained as a result.  I am finding no evidence that this word was ever used in mythology or as an alternate word for a type of hag, which again, appears to be original research.  Rorshacma (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This was actually deleted via PROD in 2009, then restored by KrakatoaKatie about a month ago after a request on her talk page. There has clearly been zero attempt at improvement since then, and no indication of any real-world sourcing. (And to be pedantic, it's actually wrong - "sahagin" has never been a D&D monster. In D&D, it's always been spelled Sahuagin, and that is a redirect to a list, which should tell you all you need to know about the real-world notability of this monster.) &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources listed, if it's a folklore-themed article, ref links to any peer-reviewed journal of folklore could establish notability. As is, non-existant sources. Oaktree b (talk) 01:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete like so many other articles created in 2004 this one lacks sources. We cannot have unsourced articles, it violates the principles of verrifiability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete A character with no real world notability. VocalIndia (talk) 12:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  Devoke water   (talk)  10:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.