Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahara Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 05:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Sahara Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article contains almost exclusively promotion and self-citation. Were I to trim the unacceptable elements, I would cut the entire article, which is what I suggest we do. CorporateM (Talk) 22:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as SPAM. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2013* (UTC)
 * Delete It looks like advertising. In fact, I think it should be marked for speedy deletion under G11. Citrusbowler (talk) 00:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - should be G11'd. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete failing WP:CORP. The company has trivial coverage by independent reliable sources. References in the article are mostly primary sources. The only independent reference yields only passing mentions. My search mainly got dozens of press releases. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Gene. It's not pure spam, but the sources appear to be primarily primary, and in the other cases spare mentions. Bearian (talk) 22:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Bearian is right; not pure spam, but pretty bloody close. Stalwart 111  02:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.