Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saheb Qiblah Fultali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Closing (NAC) as Keep (non-admin closure) Auric    talk  19:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Saheb Qiblah Fultali

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All sources given are the subject's official fansite; external links are unreliable (a Wordpress blog) or, again, tied to the subject. Searching has turned up no hits in scholarly journals, books about religion in South Asia or even general news. The subject appears to fail WP:GNG on all counts. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment doesn't seem notable to me; despite being a Bangladeshi, I never heard of him and can't find any other source about him. --»  nafSadh did say 16:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Can someone close this AfD keep? Seems like there is already a consensus. --»  nafSadh did say 20:38, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:GNG, have found few sources,, , , . -- Zayeem  (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I am British and I am sure there are plenty of notable British people who I have never heard of as well but I am aware of the subject being a very well-known Bangladeshi cleric. Nevertheless as per Kmzayeem's findings, he has received significant coverage from numerous independent, reliable sources therefore passes WP:GNG. Tanbircdq (talk) 18:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I did not posit but commented. Zayeem's sources makes him look notable. Often some Sylhet based spiritual leader do not gain attention from rest of the country; it is only natural. --»  nafSadh did say 16:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * @ nafSadh, it seem that you are offending Syleth. Saheb fultali gainn attention non only from all bangladesh, but also all asia. 217.42.231.31 (talk) 20:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Obviously he didn't gain mine, until last week. I love Sylhet, wish I could visit that place more. Instead of keeping up with personal interaction you may create an account and continue improving this article, and others on Wikipedia. --»  nafSadh did say 20:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - He is a known as a famous scholar in ASIA. WP:BIO and WP:GNG do not fail. As for MezzoMezzo, how dare you to nominated this article? You always nominate good articles. You must be ashamed of yourself. As for  nafSadh, it is strange that you never heard about him, and where can not you find other source about him? 217.42.231.31 (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No personal comments at Afd please. Be aware  that commenting on other users rather than the article is also considered disruptive. --Bejnar (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep passes WP:GNG, but weakness of existing cited sources notwithstanding, there must be better in depth coverage of him out there somewhere. --Bejnar (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.