Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saheba Subramanyam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Saheba Subramanyam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Short undersourced article. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I would caution the nom here that just because an article is short on sources, does not mean that it is not notable. Please remember to do WP:BEFORE and look up the article to check if sourcing exists. AfD is not for deleting bad articles, only those that are not notable or are irreversibly against policy. In terms of sourcing, I quickly found numerous reviews of the film:, , , , and there are clearly more out there. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 02:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Good work by . Passes GNG. Missvain (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reliable sources reviews identified above such as The Hindu and The Times of India and others so passes WP:NFILM and WP:GNG, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.