Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahi (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Sahi (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not indicate notability. Google does not support notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - article was deleted as an expired PROD, but restored by me per WP:DEPROD following a request on my talk page.  An  optimist  on the  run!  07:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: No notability shown after prod. SL93 (talk) 23:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. No refs showing coverage in reliable sources, just developer's site and sourceforge. Created by an SPA who describes himself as the author of this software, so page is likely promotional in nature. Dialectric (talk) 08:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: brief search revealed IBM's review, another review on a news site I'm not aware of, review by some company in their blog, a mention in a book and some other results form Google Books and Google Scholar with "Sahi Ajax Java" query. I would like to note, though, that the article in its current shape is no-go. Probably reducing it to stub and tagging would be appropriate. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Despite WP:SPA and WP:PROMO issues, this seems notable:, e.g. , . -- Trevj (talk) 11:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

References: View discussion to see references 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 19:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.