Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahibnoor Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify and then Speedy delete per G7. The article has been moved to draftspace and the draft was then speedy deleted by RHaworth per G7 (author requested deletion or blanked the page). (non-admin closure) 94rain  Talk  12:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Sahibnoor Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks in-depth WP:RS from multiple sources to pass WP:GNG. Just one reference from a reliable news source is not enough to qualify for a Wiki page. Meeanaya (talk) 07:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

I checked the article and i think the article is Reliable but anyways maybe your are right. Can you please explain the reasons briefly for nominating it for articles for deletion. I have cited all the points with multiple reliable sources. Thankyou Rajusinghchan (talk) 07:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: The vast majority of sourcing looks suspiciously like paid content, especially with all the "bureau" and "partnered content" tags. At least one (possibly several) explicitly state in the disclaimer that the publishing site doesn't guarantee any sort of editorial control or fact-checking, and several look like it's the same article, rehashed. Aside from that, the interviews don't confer notability, and nor does his own YouTube videos. In fact, I haven't seen one source that has an actual journalist in a by-line (that isn't an interview). So, while at a glance, it would look like he meets inclusion criteria, closer inspection of the sources definitely indicates a distinct lack of reliable sources. In addition, given that the only other article created/edited by this user was initially done as a paid contribution, I do seriously suspect an undeclared COI here - doesn't necessarily matter much in the context of the notability of the topic, but it should probably be noted for future reference. Waggie (talk) 07:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

I have deleted the article but i wanted to make sure that the wikipedia article was not paid. Thankyou Rajusinghchan (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.