Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saigon Tourist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:18, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Saigon Tourist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable tourist agency Wikieditor600 (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)


 * In the current state, the article is fine for deletion, as the Guiness World records link is basically irrelevant, so there is just one relevant reference. However, I have personally heard about this (state-run) agency, so from personal experience it is notable; but the article in the current state is not good. --- Running 10:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * you can easily google the company in google news, and many (Vietnamese) sources pop up. So I think it is notable. However, I am not going through all them, as they are more important things to do than that. Running

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails notability standards such as WP:NCORP. A search does not produce reliable sources to support this article. Wikipedia in not a travel guide. -- Otr500 (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.