Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saikumar Appoorwa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 18:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Saikumar Appoorwa

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject isn't notable - doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE Dkchana (talk) 21:55, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. References don't appear to support article. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable by Wikipedia criteria. And Adoil Descended (talk) 10:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I have looked for athletic records in India and been unable to find them even for top players. This is not a professional athlete, but a good amateur.  The claims made in the article are unsourced, because of my own experience I feel that they are also unsourceable in official records, and it is not clear to me that the events in which this athlete competed are themselves notable.   Blue Rasberry    (talk)   15:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.