Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saimeks

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 06:42, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Saimeks
Delete. Vanity, self-promotion, advertising. Article does not assert notability; in fact it asserts non-notability. 11 unique Googles for "saimeks", 246 for "paul westermeyer" (none of which seem to be relevant) and the referenced "humor" site, thefire.tk, is simply a advertising page with a redirect to a collection of links to "humorous" screeds hosted on Geocities. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D TALK  EMAIL  00:52, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Unpopular and mostly overlooked." -- BD2412 talk 01:36, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
 * Delete Is asserting non-notability notable? I think not. --Xcali 03:05, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is not asserting non-notability non-notable assertably? -- Barfooz  (talk)  03:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 05:21, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete come back when notable. &mdash; Chameleon 12:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable. Double Blue  (Talk) 15:05, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. --Phroziac 17:26, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .