Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Camillus Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Shimeru (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Saint Camillus Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ORG. 1 gnews hit. those wanting to keep must provide evidence of actual indepth coverage not say it's notable. LibStar (talk) 05:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Significant coverage in reliable independent sources at the Seattle Times, the Herald Malaysia, Agenzia Fides, buckets of sources that are less than significant but sufficient to expand the article, and a WP:BIAS presumption that as the majority of its work is in Thailand there may be foreign-language sources not readily accessible due to (a) them not being in English and (b) low internet access rates in Thailand meaning that hardcopy sources are less likely to be made avaailable online. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * being from a non English speaking country does not make articles exempt from being nominated for deletion. LibStar (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No, but per WP:N it means the article shouldn't be deleted until a serious attempt has been made to determine the existence or otherwise of such sources, which must rise higher than simply a Google search. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. References added.Ans-mo (talk) 07:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree with the Keep, but none of those references you've added are "independent" within the meaning of the word at WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 08:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 08:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 08:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources establish notability for the article. Silver  seren C 08:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.