Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Joan of Arc School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Evesham Township, New Jersey. The Bushranger One ping only 02:22, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Saint Joan of Arc School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Primary school with (as far as I can find) few or no independent sources. Can be merged into Evesham Township, New Jersey Night of the Big Wind  talk  23:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I was just in the process of creating this page myself. Seems to be a normal school with nothing to infer notability on it, certainly nothing that is mention in the article itself. A rudimentary web search brings nothing further.  Harrias  talk 23:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment, I was thinking about possibly changing the subject and focusing on the church itself. I am wondering if the church itself claims more notability than the school, although I think they are both notable. This mentions the Church., , , , , Jerry Penacoli, notable alumni Tinton5 (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Move or merge - the church is obviously notable, but the school is not. Compare User:Bearian/Standards with User:Bearian/Standards. Bearian (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge - Generally primary schools do not have their own articles.  Dough 48  72  00:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to Evesham Township, New Jersey, which currently does not mention private/parochial schools but probably should. Sorry, I don't find either the church or the school to be notable. Two of the news stories cited by Tinton5 are about vandalism which affected dozens of churches, not just this one, and the remainder of the coverage cited is purely local and routine. The church is only 50 years old, not "historic". There is nothing to make this church, or this school, stand out from thousands of others. --MelanieN (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.