Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint John's Senior Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mifter (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Saint John's Senior Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable enough. Trend SPLEND ✉ 07:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Articles on schools that provide a high school education survive AfD if they fulfill WP:V. This one does, plenty of sources, including Central Board of Secondary Education. Jack N. Stock (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES doesn't require Notability. All it requires is proof that the school in question exists - as strange as that sounds as I'm typing it. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Struck my !vote above, in line with the decision here - a decision I personally agree with. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Your vote is not in line with the decision. Who searched local print media? This AfD is (retrospectively) flawed under the admin decision. AfD of high schools requires someone fluent in local language to review local media prior to nominating for deleting. Jack N. Stock (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I noticed recent AFD or two that began to say Indian secondary schools are an exception if they go up to grade 10 not grade 12.  I don't see merit in changing wp:SCHOOLOUTCOMES which has been very useful to have in place.  We don't want a zillion AFDs and anger/debate about the policy that has worked well.  Here I don't even see evidence about what grades this school includes.  But it is a secondary school.  Keep. -- do  ncr  am  23:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Union Government of India Central Board of Secondary Education at http://cbseaff.nic.in/cbse_aff/schdir_Report/AppViewdir.aspx?affno=1730019 states 597 students in 11th and 12th grade (click on the Enrolment of the Students section). Jack N. Stock (talk) 00:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:52, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:52, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Is a clearly verifiable secondary school. Long-standing precedent. AusLondonder (talk) 05:44, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - a clearly existing and valid secondary school as per this decision CalzGuy (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.