Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint John, New Brunswick harbour cleanup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Saint John Harbour. Michig (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Saint John, New Brunswick harbour cleanup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've found some CBC articles referencing this project, but that's it for third-party references (and that would only count as one source). Everything else seems to be from government or interest groups. As such, this doesn't pass WP:GNG. Tchaliburton (talk) 02:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The weird thing about this is the idea that we need a separate article about the cleanup project, when even the parent article Saint John Harbour is barely more than a stub and could easily accomodate information about the cleanup project without requiring a spinoff (especially when that spinoff is also as stubbish as this one is.) Merge into Saint John Harbour. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge seems far more sensible than two stand-alone articles.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 09:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge done into Saint John Harbour. This article can be safely deleted anytime. Legacypac (talk) 17:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.