Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint John Sharks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. Buck  ets  ofg 02:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Saint John Sharks

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of asserted notability. Cannot determine whether its a professional or amateur league. Flibirigit 23:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete to the best of my knowledge, there are no professional ball hockey leagues. Non-notable recreational team. Resolute 23:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of sources to establish notability. --Hdt83 Chat 23:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. --Djsasso 01:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete no more notable than a slo-pitch team. Croat Canuck  Go Leafs Go 01:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as it is non-notable and lacking in terms of references. 70.72.171.181 02:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everything above. — Wenli 02:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of sources. oysterguitarist~Talk 03:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira 05:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Google search returns 6 hits, all for the team web-site which doesn't even have its own home URL. Does not appear to meet WP:ORG requirements for secondary sources.  ColtsScore 14:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be an anon's agenda inspired creation. GoodDay 20:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Pparazorback 01:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as cruft, non-notable. Bearian 02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.