Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Joseph's University Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Saint Joseph&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable university press. No third party references to establish notability. No notable publications. Seems run of the mill, like the presses that exist at most universities. GrapedApe (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge: Into Saint Joseph's University -- BenTels (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - While Wikipedia's coverage of publishers and publishing leaves much to be desired (as opposed to, say, topics relating to popular culture or breaking news), one does hope that individual company histories of publishers great and small will develop over time. This is a stub article requiring a great deal of work, but the publisher is long established and sufficiently prolific to merit encyclopedic coverage. Carrite (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete for a lack of reliable third party references. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 10:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A substantial university press with a catalog of scholarly books and journals, enough to find notability. A redirect/merge to the university's article can be discussed as an editorial matter, but I don't see deletion as helpful to the encyclopedia's coverage of academic publishing.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.