Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Leo the Great School (California)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Saint Leo the Great Parish. Consensus is to redirect, but people disagree about where to. I'm choosing one of the two possibilities, but that may be changed editorially as desired.  Sandstein  09:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Saint Leo the Great School (California)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Elementary school. Appears to be non-notable per wikipedia standards. Zero refs. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 22:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect (blank, and merge any useful  content) per convention to  Saint Leo the Great Parish where it is already  mentioned with  equivalent  content; and per nominator's own suggestion. Non  notable schools are generally  not  deleted; instead,  as demonstrated by 100s of AfD closures, they are redirected to  the article about  the school district (USA) or to  the article about  the locality (rest  of the world). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect to locality or school authority, as suggested above by Kudpung. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 12:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Roman Catholic Diocese of San Jose in California. I am recommending the diocese rather than the parish, because the parish article looks like a candidate for deletion as non-notable, whereas diocese articles are usually kept. --MelanieN (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  —MelanieN (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC) --MelanieN (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Saint Leo the Great Parish per Kudpung. Melanie, in my opinion discusson on the parish should happen there, which would involve merging anything relevant from it up to the diocese. tedder (talk) 16:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your advice, tedder. I was wondering, because based on a template at the parish article, it looks as if someone has created a separate article for every parish in this diocese. Most of these articles are mere unsourced stubs, although a few look more substantial. I think most should be redirected to the diocese article. Should I start redirect discussions, then? --MelanieN (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, or just boldly merge/redirect them. If anyone reverts, open AFD. That'll keep AFD from getting overburdened with them. tedder (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll think about those options. I note that all the articles were created by the same user in 2006 and have been minimally edited since then, so boldly merging/redirecting (with notice to interested parties) might be the way to go. --MelanieN (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I posted a comment at Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of San Jose in California, and I notified the author of the parish articles (although he/she has not been active lately). I'll let it ride for a week or two and if no one objects I will go ahead with the merges. --MelanieN (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Unless matters change, as it stands now it appears that of those two options redirect would make more sense than merge, as the article text is all non-referenced, and challenged.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to diocese, just not enough content.LuciferWildCat (talk) 22:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.