Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Philomena College, Puttur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Saint Philomena College, Puttur

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NORG no independent reliable sources and plagued by endless sockpuppetry. Theroadislong (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC) *Delete No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. Theroadislong (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. __Tumbuka Arch (talk) 11:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: The only two references found are the school's personal websites. None are reliable, and therefore this topic is not notable. HarukaAmaranth  春香 13:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep There is coverage The Hindu there are over 50 articles and extensive coverage about the subject in the  Daijiworld. 1 ,2,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7, 8 ,9 ,10 and more here.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: I was involved in undoing the damage done by COIs and socks on this article. Its state at the time of this nom was very rough. But, as POTW just demonstrated, this is a real entity that has received enough coverage in English alone to justify retention. Coverage like this further seals the deal for me: this is a crummy stub for a notable subject. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep in view of the reliable sources coverage identified by Pharaoh of the Wizards such as The Hindi, Daijiworld as well as Times of India so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * change to Keep in light of sources found. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.