Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Ursula's College, Kingsgrove


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Saint Ursula's College, Kingsgrove

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability, sourced entirely to primary sources. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Christianity,  and Australia. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sourcing available satisifies WP:GNG, as it does for pretty much any secondary school in the English-speaking western world. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * How does it satisfy WP:GNG? It's all primary sources GNG requires secondary sources. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per usual outcome for secondary schools. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES was overturned, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist now. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:34, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep there are 3rd party sources on there already, and more to be found, and there are a few good notable Alums to add, I think it needs work, not deleting JeffUK (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Sources 1,2,4, 5 and 6 are the schools website and source 3 is the website of a group the school is part of. None of these are 3rd party, in my WP: BEFORE search all I could find was either database entries, primary sources or Wikipedia mirrors. Lavalizard101 (talk) 19:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * . Lavalizard101 (talk) 19:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep per JeffUK BusterD per WP:HEY . Deus et lex (talk) 08:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * JeffUK's argument is false though, he claims 3rd party sources are on the article when all 6 sources are primary sources. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - all the sources are primary. Bearian (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment - if there's not consensus for deleting, there is a valid alternative to deletion which is a Redirect to Kingsgrove, New South Wales. The article should not be deleted. Deus et lex (talk) 23:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: My reasonable BEFORE found several reliable sources directly detailing the subject from which I've added five citations. I find 43 mentions in this volume about the Ursuline order in Australia, but only a snippet view is available in gbooks search. The three snippets shown demonstrate direct detailing of the institution. Plenty more to be found. I agree with User:Deus et lex redirection would be a superior outcome to deletion. BusterD (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep in view of the reliable sources coverage identified by BusterD which have been added to the article as references including newspapers and the above-mentioned book so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:10, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.