Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints Padova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Saints Padova

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced sports team article that does not seem to meet WP:NSPORTS notability requirements. - MrX 01:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Team in a non-notable minor league. § FreeRangeFrog 02:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete — I agree with the nominator; this team fails WP:NSPORTS. It also fails the lower threshold of WP:GNG. JFHJr (㊟) 03:26, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - From 1986 to 1991 played in the top league of Italian American football championship (Serie A AIFA 1986, Serie A AIFA 1987, Serie A1 FIAF 1988, Serie A1 FIAF 1989, Serie A1 FIAF 1990, Serie A1 FIAF 1991). --WikiMatt (talk) 12:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. According to WP:NSPORTS, cited above, WP:NSPORTS is not the applicable specific notability guideline for sports teams; WP:ORG is.  Per WP:ORG, no team or other organization is inherently notable, and it proceeds to describe the various notability requirements for organizations which, collectively, are remarkably similar to the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG.  Bottom line: I don't see any depth of coverage in independent, reliable sources that would satisfy either WP:ORG or WP:GNG.  Maybe in-depth coverage exists in Italian language reliable sources; if so, I would be willing to reconsider my vote.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd need to see some sources before I changed my position on this one.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.