Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints Row 2 soundtrack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Saints Row 2 soundtrack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lists of in-game soundtracks with no external claims of notability are classic video game trivia. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Prod removed. Topic fails GNG by itself, as only mentions are the full track listings and no dedicated critical commentary, but a mention of the highlights in the main article's prose would make sense. czar ♔  15:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not the worst trivia list that I've seen, but it still lacks notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints Row: The Third soundtrack contains the rest of the bundle (SR1, 3, 4). czar  ♔  21:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The other three soundtracks were deleted. czar  ♔  14:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)




 * Merge.GTA is mentioned as being more notable and having more significant cultural impact than the Saint's Row series, per other deletion articles. However, this is highly arguable, as both series have a significant following. I'd sooner suggest merging a more simplified version of the tracklisting to the actual game's article than straight deleting the articles while retaining none of the information. Would suggest the same for the GTA soundtrack articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.14.55.22 (talk) 00:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)  — 184.14.55.22 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Series popularity/following (or any other series) doesn't have any impact on their notability and especially their soundtrack's individual notability. The only criteria is notability as defined by Wikipedia, namely WP:GNG. Popularity and notability very often overlap, but similarly a popular thing can be non-notable just as an unpopular thing can be notable. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:42, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  05:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete as not passing WP:GNG with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. I see soruces for teh release, but nothing offers critical commentary besides generic "here is a list of tracks". I can't find anything else of significant coverage and nothing outside the sources about the game itself. I don't suggest merging, as this will make main article unwieldy and a list of every track isn't essential information. The main article already has a sourced prose section on soundtrack and audio, which is sufficient. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:42, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.