Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saipol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Avril Group. Black Kite (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Saipol

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not justify any notability per WP:COMPANY TopCipher (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG: Biodiesel Magazine, Reuters, La France Agricole. More sources available in French business press.  Appears that steps were missed in WP:BEFORE. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Does it make sense to redirect it to Avril Group? -- HighKing ++ 11:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Avril Group. This on its own fails WP:GNG. There is no widespread, in depth coverage. Just bits here and there. Wikipedia is not The Wall Street Journal. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Avril Group; no independent secondary sourcing. Anything useful (of which I'm not convinced) can be picked up from the article history. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Avril Group. Simply not enough in-depth coverage of the subordinate entity to warrant a stand-alone article.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.