Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saiwyn Quadras


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Saiwyn Quadras

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG CelenaSkaggs (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - A Screen Awards winner up for AfD? Also wrote two Filmfare Awards Best Film-nominated films. Best Screenwriter of two major films Mary Kom and Neerja.  The forthcoming Parmanu: The Story Of Pokhran is also a major-release starring John Abraham.  Easily passes WP:BIO.  An Academy Awards or BAFTA Film Awards-nominated screenwriter would never even be considered for AfD.  Is this a case of WP:BIAS?--Oakshade (talk) 21:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep winner of a notable award with reliable sources in the article and google news, passes WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article content is minimal but the confirmed awards are enough to meet WP:CREATIVE 4(c). AllyD (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Awards won are sufficient enough proof that subject passes WP:BIO and WP:FILMMAKER. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly notable per WP:CREATIVE, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The awards have legitimate sources and were a part of huge Bollywood films. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FSOJM791 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep per WP:CREATIVE.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.