Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajid Ishaq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE as equivalent to an expired Prod. Article nominated for weeks with no objections raised to deletion. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Sajid Ishaq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is unambiguously promotion with statements such as "He is playing an essential role in creating...", "He holds strong reputation in", "his experience and expertise in the field" etc. If this was just a few instances, then I would fix it and not nominate for deletion but basically the entire article is written this way. IMHO it is a prime candidate for WP:BLOWITUP. I also question the notability of the subject to begin with. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.