Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjad Gul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Sajjad Gul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this and this and there are simply no signs of better improvement. Can you believe this has existed since October 2005 with this being the start? Pinging, and  and also author. SwisterTwister  talk  05:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. This article alone should be enough to show clear notability. One of the major figures in Lollywood for decades. Most sources are probably not in the Latin script, so finding them is harder (for most of us at least), but what is there shows that he is clearly notable. Fram (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have no real opinion on notability. My BLP tag was changed to another within about three weeks by another editor. Please ping that editor. It is true all external links are to IMDb, and there are no inline citations. So the maintenance tag is correct. Please someone add some sources, Latin based language or not. Actually, I see articles such as this everyday and just cringe at the state of our BLPs and article content in general. We are not winning the battle on quality here...thanks. Fylbecatulous talk 11:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. What is necessary is for people who can find and read the available sources to work on this, but from the career specified, notability is very likely. IMdB doesn't prove notability ,but it does provide verification of the films.  DGG ( talk ) 08:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep notable biography. Just need few references. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.