Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjad Ullah Baqi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:NPOL #1. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 21:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Sajjad Ullah Baqi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod that was contested-originally I restored the prod thinking it was a blp prod but in fact it was a normal one. No notability mentioned as well as only refs are els' Wgolf (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  16:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Smells like an autobio. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep + wikify to remove promotional tone. Sajjad Ullah meets WP:NPOL as a member of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly one of the four provincial governments of Pakistan as verified by official government source. []. Cowlibob (talk) 18:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Member of provincial legislative assembly. which is presumed notable in any country.  DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep and clean up as needed. Subject passes WP:POLITICIAN a former provincial lawmaker. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment via WP:PAK Needs a rewrite and secondary sources. Due to the current state of article, I'm bent towards delete with the possibility of recreation through AFC as the lack of inline references for the content are creating BLP issues. -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep As a member of a Provincial assembly passes WP:POLITICIAN which is verified by reliable sources. Article needs editing not deleting. Davewild (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.