Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakintek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE ( T + C + CVU ) 03:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Sakintek
No assertion of meeting WP:MUSIC. 19 Google hits when excluding Wikipedia mirrors. Punkmorten 00:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC) caps mine. Jcuk 23:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Alr 00:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep . The mere fact of something's existence makes it worthy of inclusion.  Kurt Weber 02:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as part of the fight against inclusionist vandalism. The mere fact that my Internet forum exists does not make it worthy of inclusion. Ashibaka tock 03:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:MUSIC --Jaranda wat's sup 03:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this non-notable band. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  03:35, Dec. 17, 2005
 * Delete nn, vanity link only.--MONGO 04:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novacatz (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - Quote from WP:MUSIC. "This page gives some rough guidelines which we MIGHT use to decide if a musical topic is notable. Please note that the failure to meet any of these criteria does NOT mean an article must be deleted."
 * Delete, fails all notability requirements. Andrew Levine 00:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. --Stormie 02:36, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.