Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sal Novin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Sal Novin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Although it's not clear-cut, I don't think this individual meets notability criteria. He was awarded by the Nashville Technology Council - but that award doesn't appear to be notable, and the only coverage it resulted in appears to be local in scope and specialist in nature (business press). I42 (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

There have been a large number of articles about Health Mason in recent times, including the very important Medical News: and, and and  and and many others including the ones referenced in the article. The fact the Nashville Technological Council has recognized Sal Novin, as the 2009 Innovator of the Year, and the buzz that this innovation has created around the world makes me absolutely convinced the person noteworthy. I also found a reference to Health Masson and Sal Novin in the Reference dictionary.
 * Health Masson is an important innovation wrt Health Costs

Artaxerex (talk) 22:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * This proposal is not clear. Is Health Mason also being suggested for deletion? It appears that the software may be notable, in which case the article on the person should be merged there. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  08:23, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The article on Health Mason did not exist when I raised this AfD. Despite the article creator's comments above about that product being notable, this AfD is about the article on Sal Novin. I42 (talk) 09:03, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I respectfully submit that, if Health Mason is a noteworthy AI, and if the Nashville Technology Council's award for Innovator of the Year is of any note, then perhaps the person who created the AI, and won the award for it would be of note.  Artaxerex (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That does not follow at all. Coverage / awards for the product which mention the creator only in passing most likely do not affirm notability to him. Even if there is significant coverage of the creator, this has to be considered with WP:BIO1E in mind. So far I see no indication either is notable. I42 (talk) 21:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Here we go again! This happened many times before and I don't have time for it. Like the one before, I am not going to fight this one either. Go ahead and delete it. Artaxerex (talk) 03:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * speedy delete. Author requests deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. I'm not going to enterpret something the creator most likely said out of frustration as a CSD G7 request. More discussion is required before this article is deleted. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm not finding much coverage specifically about Sal Novin. This article is th eonly indpendent coverage.  A local technology award isn't that notable.  At coverage is insufficient for ntoability.  As for the Helath Mason coverage and being notable as its creator, I'm not convinved that Helath Mason is even notable.  The links shown above are all press releases, and in fact are the same press release.  Compare Medical News (sourced to Linnaeus Inc.) with Earth Times (explicitly noted as a press release) and the Highbeam summary.  -- Whpq (talk) 20:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I don;t think either the product or the person is notable yet., and I do not consider a local award of that sort significant.  DGG ( talk ) 02:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.