Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sal Strazzullo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Sal Strazzullo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

While attorney Sal Strazzullo has been able to draw the media to hear what he has to say about his representation of some of his clients, that notoriety hasn't yet translated into reliable sources writing enough biographical information about Strazzullo to maintain a Wikipedia biographical article on the topic. Does not meet WP:GNG. In addition, the article seems more about being a place to list unflattering information about Strazzullo than being an account of Strazzullo's life. See BLP Noticeboard report. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as newspaper mentions appear peripheral to his clients. That the article has been used to post non-neutral content is not itself a rationale for deletion--I've gone that route in the past. 99.156.65.73 (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete – I, too, agree with the nominator. This subject passes neither WP:GNG nor WP:ANYBIO; even with sources, the actual coverage of this subject has been in passing and mostly involving his clients. Generally, representatives speak more to the notability of the topic at hand (the client), and not themselves. Even when this subject has represented notable people, the coverage was not substantially about him. See WP:Articles for deletion/David Benowitz, WP:Articles for deletion/Ray Siderius on similar individuals. JFHJr (㊟) 02:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per comments above. Didn't see any articles about him, only aggressive quotes by him about his clients and their cases.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.