Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saladin tithe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep as I would've frankly commented myself but the nominator unfortunately has not clarified exactly how they feel this over 1,000 words article with sources is "questionable" thus Keeping for now (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  06:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Saladin tithe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

notability problem Erftyhujk (talk) 11:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC) (categories)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 17.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Notability is not in question according to my (brief) search:, , , . The article could use some inline citations, but that's no reason to delete. clpo13(talk) 16:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of reliable sources. Some inline referencing added. FeatherPluma (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. You can't just say "notability problem" and not expand, especially with something that is clearly notable. And why would you nominate an article for deletion as your first ever edit? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep -- In my view, as part of the financial measures taken in England to raise money to fund a crusade, it is certainly notable. Richard I sold off whatever property he could to raise funds for the crusade.  The definition of time immemorial is when he left for the crusade.  This is because later generations did not want to enquire into royal fundraising of that period.  If a person could show his right from immediately after, it was unquestionable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.