Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salamanca Risk Management Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Salamanca Risk Management Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No sources in three years. Notability not established. Joja lozzo  23:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent coverage found via Google search, Google Books, Google Scholar. Searched quality British newspapers Times/Telegraph/Indie/Guardian/FT, but nothing found. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - a privately-held (not traded) company. There is no evidence from inside or outside the article that its similarity to other companies, as noted in the article, means that it is notable. Why wasn't this prodded? Bearian (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.