Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saleem Sadiq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Saleem Sadiq

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks substantial RS coverage. Zero refs. Tagged for zero refs, and for being an orphan, over 3 years ago. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - But Needs a complete re-write with proper references. -- C h i n n Z      ( talk &#124;  Contrib ) 06:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What is your rationale for suggesting it be kept?--Epeefleche (talk) 07:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I did find this, but there needs to be more sources. SL93 (talk) 23:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 11:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete unless Chinnz can supply claimed citations. Nyttend (talk) 02:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: The one source provided above looked pretty solid. Certainly better than anything the "lazily parroting websites=reliable sources" approach seems to come up with.  The denizens of the wrestling websites used over and over again as sources probably couldn't find Pakistan on a globe, so you probably shouldn't expect any of them to write about it.  I guess what I'm trying to say is this: apart from "anything," what sort of sources are you looking for here?  Also, what is the likelihood that any of them are going to be in English?  Furthermore, if abundant sources did exist in another language, would that change anyone's mind?  I get the impression that a lot of recent wrestling AfDs are either oblivious to or perhaps actually capitalizing on the fact that abundant reliable sources likely exist, but are sources which are far removed from the consciousness of the average American wrestling fan.  The ones who contribute here appear to be very content with their favored sources and don't wish to know otherwise.RadioKAOS (talk) 02:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi. We need multiple, substantial, independent coverage in RSs (in any language).  We have many people in Category:Pakistani businesspeople who have coverage in Dawn, Daily Times, News International, Business Recorder, and the like -- just to name some of the local newspapers in English -- as well as in other non-English papers and non-local papers.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.