Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salem - Karur Passenger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (soft) slakr  \ talk / 11:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Salem - Karur Passenger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Speedy Delete Wikipedia is not a timetable. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Fails WP:GNG. J bh Talk  20:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:NOT The Dissident Aggressor 21:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: I've cleaned it up, removed the timetable, linked the locations, and we should wait for someone to find sources. If it's a distinct railway line (as opposed to just a timetabled service), then it should have an article. Pam  D  07:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Looking further: as Clarityfiend points out it's a train service not a railway line, but it appears that in coverage of Indian railways it's the services, not the lines, which get articles - see Tiruchirappalli_Junction_railway_station etc, compared to the UK coverage of lines (eg Category:Railway lines in North West England ). I've added Clarity's two refs to the article. Pam  D  08:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:47, 17 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. According to these The Hindu articles, it appears to be just a train service on the Karur-Namakkal-Salem line. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  14:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


 * A couple of sources about the train, yes, but probably not enough to meet WP:GNG here. However there's a lot more coverage of the line it runs on (examples:, ) - surely it would be more useful to refocus the article on that and make the passenger train a section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.190.197 (talk) 19:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.