Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SalesLoft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

SalesLoft

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails notability, and notability (organizations and companies) guidelines, and the primary contributor has a conflict of interest. Company is not a significant company, but an Atlanta-based Startup and the page is written as a corporate resume. A reference list is included, but individual article components are unreferenced, making independent verification of article tedious. Article's most active editor was User:SalesLoft, but that editor is an unregistered user and was likely a paid editor or employee. Article was nominated for speedy deletion in 2012 for failing WP:CORP and WP:GNG, but banner was removed by an unregistered user/IP address. Absent significant editing to make the article objective and properly referenced, I propose deletion. Stiche1775 (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Stiche1775 (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep and get an admin to topic ban User:SalesLoft. This needs a major rewrite, which I will start, but it is actually notable, searches came up with good sources. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as I found some decent sources for this article. Business Insider and entrepreneur.com both have articles for this company. Sheepythemouse (talk) 22:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches are finding nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister   talk  06:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – The topic passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , . North America1000 07:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep but add tags - there are plenty of sources and it is notable. But the article itself needs to be severely improved. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.