Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SalesTrax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  01:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

SalesTrax

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This sure seems like corporate self-promotion to me, even with the given sources. Bringing here for further discussion after speedying earlier versions. NawlinWiki 17:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only one of those sources has SalesTrax as its primary subject, and I'm not convinced that one is an independent source, or nontrivial. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, full of weblinks as opposed to wikilinks. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 19:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability per WP:CORP is not shown by the included links; merely being cited as a resource, even a recommended resource, is not sufficient independent commentary IMO.  Sorry, no sale. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No solid non-trivial references. --SubSeven 20:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-promotion, lack of notability. Would consider speedy per db-corp Kai A. Simon 22:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The whole thing is written like an ad. The first section is "Recognition." Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 22:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It was worth the looking at, to confirm that it is a trivial ad, and probably it would be impossible to write an acceptable article on this NN company.DGG 03:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.