Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sales quote


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Request for quotation. Daniel (talk) 22:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Sales quote

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)


 * Delete Another article that consists solely of a WP:DICTDEF with no sources. Tooncool64 (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Owen&times;  &#9742;  22:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Request for quotation: no more than a DICDEF by itself. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. As far as redirect, the landing page doesn't look much better. Suitskvarts (talk) 13:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Request for quotation, per User:OwenX, a common-sense WP:ADT proposal. A "sales quote" is, obviously, a thing that exists, and one that a reader might want to look up in an encyclopedia. The article, Request for quotation, stands to be improved, but deletion isn't cleanup—even for adjacent articles. BD2412  T 14:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect: Per Suitskvarts and BD2412, the best target is Request for quotation. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 18:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.