Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salih Ozkan

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE.

Salih Ozkan
Article is a fabrication. If it were true, Salih would be a very notable chess player, but all the chess claims are lies. Claims to have won Corus 2005&mdash;actual winner was Peter Leko (see ). Claims to have been 1= with Kramnik at Linares 2003&mdash;actual results were Vladimir Kramnik and Leko tied for first (see ). You probably won't be surprised to discover that Salih Ozkan did not play in any of these supergrandmaster tournaments, that the World Chess Federation FIDE has no recorded rating for Mr Ozkan, and that User:Salihoz is responsible for his own article. Banish to wikihell. Quale 2 July 2005 07:49 (UTC)
 * That would be a delete in my terms. - Mgm|(talk) July 2, 2005 16:39 (UTC)
 * Delete, clear and present hoax. It's got a picture that fuzzy that helps to give the game away...-Splash July 2, 2005 16:54 (UTC)
 * Delete, as hoax. --Sn0wflake 2 July 2005 18:41 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete to Wiki-Hell as a hoax. -- BD2412 talk July 2, 2005 21:37 (UTC)
 * Delete - a vain fabrication. Rob Church 3 July 2005 00:10 (UTC)
 * Delete because hoax. Good work, Quale. Sietse 3 July 2005 13:10 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 01:36 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax, falsified claims. Falsification not currently criteria for Speedy deletion - maybe it should be. --WCFrancis 4 July 2005 07:35 (UTC)
 * Delete (and could probably be speedied since deliberately adding misinformation could arguably be interpreted as "pure vandalism"). I often disagree with Quale when it comes to notability, but I certainly agree with his position of what to do with hoaxes. Nice job with the evidence collection, and good to see someone is watching what goes in to the chess category. Sjakkalle (Check!)  4 July 2005 13:17 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.